韩国总统候选人金文洙提议允许国家养老基金投资比特币

2025-05-05 00:06

韩国执政党“国民力量党”的总统候选人金文洙（前劳动部长）近日表示，如果当选，他将考虑允许国家主要机构，如国民年金公团（NPS）和韩国投资公司（KIC），投资包括比特币（BTC）在内的虚拟资产。NPS 是全球第三大养老基金。金文洙认为，鉴于国内外经济环境的变化，虚拟资产的存在不容忽视，并承诺将通过制度化来培育和稳定国内加密市场。据估计，韩国约有1630万公民持有或曾持有加密资产。此番表态是韩国即将到来的总统大选（6月3日）中，各政党积极争取加密货币持有者选票的最新例证。两大主要政党近期都提出了多项对加密市场友好的政策意向，但有业内人士提醒，以往选举中的类似承诺未必都能完全兑现，需关注后续实际行动。 (PANews)

Loading...

24시간 플래시

오늘 2025-05-05

07:14

IOTA Rebased mainnet upgrade launched today, users need to use the new wallet to access assets

06:44

Kyrgyzstan will issue USDKG, a US dollar stablecoin pegged to gold, in Q3

06:17

Vitalik: The quality of the underlying proof system in L2 networks is equally important and should gradually enter the second stage as it develops

Odaily Planet Daily News: In response to the naming tag BattleTested proposed by community member Daniel Wang for Stage 2 of the L2 network, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik posted on the X platform, saying, "This is a good reminder that Stage 2 is not the only factor affecting security, and the quality of the underlying proof system is equally important. This is a simplified mathematical model that shows when to enter Stage 2: Each member of the Security Council has a 10% chance of independent 'breaking'; We consider activity failure (refusal of signature or key access) and security failure (signing the wrong thing or key being hacked) as equally likely; Goal: Minimize the likelihood of protocol collapse under the above assumptions. *Stage 0 Security Council is 4/7, Stage 1 is 6/8; Please note that these assumptions are very incomplete. In fact, members of the Security Council have a "common pattern failure": they may collude, or all be coerced or hacked in the same way, and so on. This makes both Stage 0 and Stage 1 less secure than shown in the model, so entering Stage 2 earlier than implied by the model is the best choice. In addition, please note that by turning the proof system itself into a multi signature of multiple independent systems, the probability of the proof system crashing can be greatly reduced (which is what I advocated in my previous proposal). I suspect that all second phase deployments in previous years will be like this. Considering these factors, this is a chart. The X-axis represents the probability of system failure. The Y-axis represents the probability of protocol collapse. As the quality of the proof system improves, the optimal stage shifts from stage 0 to stage 1, and then from stage 1 to stage 2. Using the quality proof system of Stage 0 for Stage 2 is the worst. In short, @ l2beat should ideally demonstrate proof of system auditing and maturity metrics (preferably proof of system implementation rather than the entire summary so that we can reuse it) as well as stages

06:09

Asian currency revaluation becomes a new market theme, or may be affected by US tariff policies

06:06

SUI abnormal, up 5.96% in 24H